RSO-F has made a strong start on ForecastBench, a leading independent benchmark for evaluating how well AI models predict real-world events. In the 22 September 2026 preliminary dataset results, our first submission scored above the highest-scoring listed entries from OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI and FutureSearch.

Listed as RSO-F-ST, the model scored 64.9 on the Dataset Brier Index across 241 resolved questions from the seven-day horizon of our 30 August submission. That places RysoAI close to Google DeepMind and Google Cloud at 65.0, with Torchcast AI at 65.8 in this comparison.

ForecastBench · 22 September 2026

RSO-F’s first seven-day results

Dataset Brier Index · Higher is better

ForecastBench dataset scores on 22 September 2026: Torchcast AI 65.8; Google DeepMind 65.0; Google Cloud 65.0; RysoAI 64.9; FutureSearch 63.3; xAI 63.1; OpenAI 63.0; Anthropic 61.7. Lines show 95% confidence intervals.

Dots: score · Lines: 95% confidence interval

Selected organizations, best listed entry each. RSO-F: 241 resolved seven-day dataset questions. Other entries span different questions and submission histories.

View the frozen source
Exact models, scores and question counts

One entry represents each selected organization’s highest score in the frozen snapshot. Tied configurations are listed alongside it. These are model results, not company averages; the Brier Index is not a percentage of correct answers.

ForecastBench preliminary dataset leaderboard, 22 September 2026
RankModel configurationDataset Brier Index95% confidence intervalResolved dataset questions
6labubu-nanoTorchcast AIAlso tied: skullpanda-nano65.863.4–68.3241
12big green leafGoogle DeepMindAlso tied: blue croc65.063.7–66.3722
12NanoForecaster-MTV-0830Google Cloud65.063.7–66.3241
17RSO-F-STRysoAI64.963.1–66.7241
38fb_early_closer_v2FutureSearchAlso tied: fb_forecaster_v2, futuresearch_bull_v463.362.3–64.3722
47Grok 4.20 (Beta, C)xAI63.162.1–64.1681
49gpt-5.5-2026-04-23-high-web-searchOpenAI63.061.9–64.1974
93claude-opus-5-adaptive-thinking-max-web-search-code-execution-128kAnthropic61.760.6–62.7934
Our takeaway

“Our first public results show RSO-F competing with leading forecasting systems on short-term predictions.”

What this means

This is an early demonstration of what we are building RSO-F to do: turn information available today into better predictions of what happens next. A first public submission that competes with established forecasting teams and outperforms the compared frontier-model entries gives us a strong foundation to build on.

Joint first on conflict and protest data

RSO-F ranked joint first on ACLED in the original seven-day results. Across the 50 ACLED questions from our 30 August submission, RSO-F-ST scored 0.0487 mean Brier using the outcomes archived on 22 September 2026. It tied with our two other Ryso variants at the top of 112 eligible entries, ahead of the best listed configurations from OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Google DeepMind, Google Cloud and Torchcast AI.

ACLED records political violence and protest events around the world. These ForecastBench questions ask whether event counts or fatalities in a rolling 30-day window will exceed thresholds derived from historical data, with the outcome assessed seven days after submission. The result points to a promising capability for forecasting changes in conflict and protest activity.

Update, 10 October 2026: one outcome was subsequently revised. Recalculating the same forecasts gives RSO-F a 0.0685 Brier score and joint sixth place. The chart preserves the original September result; the downloadable data includes both versions.

30 August 2026 round · Snapshot: 22 September 2026

ACLED: the seven-day comparison

Mean Brier score · Lower is better

ACLED seven-day mean Brier scores, 22 September 2026 snapshot: RysoAI 0.0487; Anonymous 24 0.0500; Anthropic 0.0634; Google DeepMind 0.0723; Torchcast AI 0.0830; OpenAI 0.0834; xAI 0.0904; Google Cloud 0.0911. Lower is better.

Dots: mean Brier score on 50 identical questions

RysoAI calculation from ForecastBench’s public files. Best listed configuration per selected model provider or team; the full comparison covers 112 eligible entries. This is a source-specific analysis, separate from the official leaderboard above.

View the pinned resolution dataDownload the comparison data and calculation method

Derived from ForecastBench public data · CC BY-SA 4.0

Exact models, scores and question counts

All entries are scored on the same 50 ACLED questions resolving on 6 September 2026, using outcomes archived on 22 September. Scores are the average squared difference between the forecast probability and outcome. The displayed point estimates do not establish statistical significance. Provider labels identify the model’s organization; third-party submitters are named in the table. Labels follow the downloaded archive; Anonymous 24 is the best non-Ryso entry and has no public company logo.

ACLED, 30 August round, seven-day horizon; 22 September 2026 snapshot
RankModel configurationMean Brier scoreSubmitted byResolved dataset questions
1RSO-F-STRysoAI0.0487Ryso AI50
4model-4Anonymous 240.0500Anonymous 2450
10claude-fable-5Anthropic0.0634Kerem Delikoyun50
16gemini-3.1-pro-preview-highGoogle DeepMind0.0723ForecastBench50
32molly-nanoTorchcast AI0.0830Torchcast AI50
36gpt-5.5-2026-04-23OpenAI0.0834ForecastBench50
53grok-4.20-0309-reasoningxAI0.0904ForecastBench50
60NanoForecaster-ATL-0830Google Cloud0.0911Google Cloud50

Reading the results

The first chart captures ForecastBench’s preliminary dataset leaderboard on 22 September 2026. It shows the highest-scoring listed entry for each selected organization. RSO-F’s result comes from its first seven-day forecasts; the other entries have different question sets and submission histories.

The Dataset Brier Index measures probability forecast performance after adjusting for question difficulty; higher is better. Lines show 95% confidence intervals. The preliminary board covers dataset questions; the tournament leaderboard combines dataset and prediction-market results.

Where we need to improve

The short-term ACLED result is stronger than the longer-horizon result. On the separate 50-question, 30-day set from the same round, RSO-F-ST ranks 29th of 112 entries in our 10 October calculation. Part of the rolling 30-day observation window has already elapsed when a seven-day forecast is submitted. Forecasting further ahead demands more of the model, and improving that performance is a priority.

The next test

We expect some performance decay as longer-horizon outcomes are scored. We also expect RSO-F to remain highly competitive. The next milestone is the combined tournament leaderboard: ForecastBench applies a 50-day waiting period before eligibility, putting our 30 August submission’s earliest entry on 19 October. We will publish the full dataset and prediction-market comparison when it appears.

For the two submission rounds following our 30 August debut, we are testing a range of approaches and specific forecasting cases against live data. We expect these experimental submissions to perform roughly in the middle of the pack while we learn what works. Each test helps us understand where the model is strong, where it needs work and which improvements carry over to new questions.

Explore RSO-F
October tournament resultNovember RSO-F results

From the archive. The date refers to the period described.

ForecastBench preliminary leaderboard

Leaderboard snapshot, 22 September 2026

How ForecastBench works